Jan 03, 2026·7 min
Automated release notes from commits and screenshots
Automated release notes from commits and screenshots: a simple workflow to turn small PR notes and UI snapshots into clear changelogs with less manual editing.
Automated release notes from commits and screenshots: a simple workflow to turn small PR notes and UI snapshots into clear changelogs with less manual editing.
Release notes are one of those tasks everyone agrees are useful, but they often get pushed to the end of the week when energy is low. After a few busy sprints, they turn into a rushed paragraph or get skipped entirely.
Part of the problem is timing. The details live in commits, PR threads, and quick chat messages. By the time you sit down to write a changelog, you’re trying to remember why a change mattered, who it helped, and what a user will actually notice.
There’s also a language mismatch. Developers write things like “refactor auth middleware” or “fix race in cache,” but users want “Sign-in is more reliable” or “Pages load faster on slow connections.” Translating technical work into user language takes focus, and it’s hard to do while context-switching.
Formatting drift makes it worse. One week you write bullets, the next week you write paragraphs. One person adds emojis and another writes ticket IDs. Over time, the changelog stops feeling trustworthy because readers can’t scan it quickly or compare releases.
The good news is you already produce most of the raw material. A small PR description plus a couple of UI snapshots usually contain everything you need. The goal isn’t to write a novel. It’s to produce consistent, user-friendly notes with less manual work.
A simple approach works best:
To get release notes that feel consistent, be clear about the inputs you already have. Most teams are sitting on plenty of detail. It’s just scattered.
A commit is the smallest unit: a technical record of what changed in the code. Commit messages are useful for tracing work, but they often say things like “fix lint” or “refactor header,” which isn’t what a customer wants to read.
A PR (pull request) description is the bridge. It explains why the change exists, what a reviewer should check, and what changed from a product point of view. If you want automated release notes, PR descriptions are usually the best raw material because they can be written in plain language without being long.
Issue titles (or ticket titles) add another hint: they name the problem being solved. When PRs reference issues, you get a clean thread from “reported problem” to “shipped fix.”
A UI snapshot (screenshot or short annotated image) is a visual record of what the user will actually see. It’s not decoration. It’s evidence and context.
Release-note outputs usually split into two types:
Different audiences read these notes for different reasons. Customers want to know what changed for them today. Support needs to know what to expect and what to tell users. Sales and success look for what’s new and worth mentioning. Internal teams need a record of what shipped and what might break.
Screenshots are most useful when they help you do three things: confirm the change is real, remind you of the exact labels and button names, and show a before/after in a way text can’t.
A good changelog is less about writing and more about sorting. If the structure stays the same every release, you can turn small PR notes into release notes without rethinking the format each time.
Choose 4 to 6 categories that match how users talk about your product. Too many buckets slow you down and create “misc” piles.
A practical set is:
“Admin” is useful when changes affect owners, billing, roles, or settings. If your product is developer-facing, you might swap it for “API.” Keep the names stable so readers learn where to look.
Draw a clear line between user-facing and internal-only. A simple rule: if a user could notice it, search for it, or rely on it, it belongs in release notes. If it’s only refactoring, dependency bumps, or logging changes, keep it out unless it changes behavior.
Pick one sentence pattern and stick to it. This prevents PR descriptions from turning into mini essays and keeps the final notes easy to scan.
A reliable pattern is:
What changed + who it affects + where to find it.
For example: “Added two-factor login for workspace owners in Settings.” Even if you later adjust tone, the raw input stays consistent.
A tiny glossary helps more than most teams expect. Pick one term for each key concept and don’t mix synonyms (for example, always say “workspace,” not sometimes “project” and sometimes “team space”). Consistent wording makes release notes feel like one voice, not five.
The easiest way to get automated release notes is to treat every PR as a small, user-facing story. If someone outside your team can read the PR title and understand what changed, you’re most of the way there.
Start with the PR title. Make it one clear sentence in plain language, focused on the outcome, not the implementation. Compare “Add caching layer to search” with “Search results load faster.” The second one can be copied straight into a changelog.
Keep the PR description short (2 to 5 lines), but make each line do a job:
Tags help later when you’re sorting a week of changes. Use consistent brackets like [UI], [API], [Billing], [Performance]. One or two tags is enough. Too many tags turn into noise.
Add a single “User impact” line that reads like a release note. For example: “Admins can now export invoices as CSV.” That one line is gold when you’re compiling updates under time pressure.
Screenshots belong in the PR description only when the UI changed. Use one before and one after, cropped tightly to the area that changed. If nothing visible changed, skip screenshots and write one extra sentence explaining the difference.
Here is a simple PR description pattern you can paste into your template:
[UI] Faster search results
Intent: Reduce wait time on the search page.
User impact: Everyone sees results in under 1 second for common queries.
Edge cases: Empty search now shows “Try a different keyword”.
Screenshots can save hours when you’re writing release notes, but only if they’re easy to find and easy to understand. A random pile of images named “Screenshot 12” turns into busywork.
Start with a simple naming pattern so you can search later. One option is YYYY-MM-DD_area_feature_state. For example: 2026-01-14_billing_invoices_empty.png. When someone asks, “When did we change this screen?”, you can answer in seconds.
Capture the state that tells the story. The “happy path” isn’t always the most helpful. If a release changes behavior, show the moment a user would notice.
Aim for 1 to 3 screenshots per change. The most useful ones tend to be:
Keep annotations light. If the screenshot needs help, add one arrow or one highlight. Avoid paragraphs on the image. Put the explanation in the PR description instead, where it can be reused in the changelog.
Where you store screenshots matters as much as what you capture. Save them next to the PR (or in a shared folder) and include the PR ID in the filename or caption. Example: “PR-1842: updated checkout error message.”
A small habit that pays off: when you change UI text, spacing, or contrast, add a one-line note like “Improved button contrast for readability.” That line often becomes a clean release note without extra rewriting.
You don’t need a fancy system to get reliable release notes. You need one small habit: every merged PR should contain a short, user-facing note, and every UI change should have a screenshot that matches it.
Pick a release window (for example, Monday to Friday). Pull merged PR titles and descriptions from that window into one draft document. If a PR has no clear description, don’t guess. Ask the author to add one line while the context is fresh.
Match screenshots to the PRs that changed the UI. One screenshot per visible change is usually enough. Label them so it’s obvious what they show (before/after helps when the difference is subtle).
Then do a quick cleanup pass:
Finish with a fast review. Share the draft with support or product and ask one question: “Would a customer understand what changed and why it matters?” If the answer is no, simplify the words or add a small bit of context.
For example, instead of “Refactored permissions middleware,” write “You can now manage team roles from the Settings page.”
Raw inputs (commit messages, PR notes, and screenshots) are written for teammates. Release notes are written for users. The job is translation, not copy-paste.
A few drafting rules keep every entry clear:
Consistency matters more than perfect wording. Pick one tense (most teams use past tense: “Fixed,” “Improved,” “Added”) and stick to it. Use the same capitalization rules every time. If you name features, follow one naming pattern, such as “Feature name (area)” like “Saved views (Reports).” Small rules like this stop the changelog from feeling messy.
When something will interrupt a user, say it plainly and give the next step. Skip the technical cause.
Example: “API keys created before Jan 10 will stop working. Create a new key in Settings - API keys.”
Only add a “Known issues” section when users are likely to hit it. Keep it short and include a workaround when you have one.
Example: “Known issue: CSV export may time out on very large reports. Workaround: export by date range.”
Screenshots should earn their place. Add one when it helps users spot a new control, a moved button, or a new screen. Keep screenshots internal when the change is minor (spacing, colors, small copy edits) or the UI is still likely to shift before the next release.
Most release note pain shows up a week after the feature ships. Someone asks, “Was this change intentional?” and you end up digging through PRs, screenshots, and chat threads. If you want automated release notes to stay useful, avoid the traps that make notes hard to read and hard to trust.
These patterns cause the most rework:
Small UI changes are another common miss. A renamed button, a moved menu item, or a new empty state can confuse users more than a backend refactor. If a screenshot changed, mention it, even briefly. A simple line like “The Export button moved to the top-right of the table” saves a lot of back-and-forth.
Here’s a quick example. You ship a new billing page layout and also tighten who can edit invoices. If you only note “Improved billing page,” admins will assume nothing else changed. A better note separates them: one line for the layout change, one line for the role change, with the role named.
Good release notes aren’t longer. They’re clearer, and they age well.
A good release note answers three questions fast: what changed, where to see it, and who it matters to. Before you hit publish, do one last pass with fresh eyes.
Read each item like you’re the user, not the builder. If you need to guess what it means, rewrite it.
After the checklist, do a quick “translation” read. Replace internal words (ticket IDs, component names, feature flags) with plain terms users recognize. If a feature is behind a rollout or only in certain tiers, say so directly.
Ask one person outside engineering to read it. It can be a founder, support, sales, or a friend. If they can’t answer “What changed?” in 10 seconds, the text is still too close to the PR.
Example: “Improved settings modal state handling” becomes “Settings now save reliably after you switch tabs.”
A small team ships 12 PRs in a week: 4 UI tweaks, 2 bug fixes, and the rest are small refactors and tests. They want automated release notes, but they also want them to read like a human wrote them.
Instead of waiting until Friday, they collect inputs as they work. Every PR includes one “user-facing note” line and, if the UI changed, a single before/after screenshot. The screenshots live next to the PR notes (same place every time), so nobody has to hunt through chat threads later.
On Friday, one person scans the PR notes and groups similar changes. Four small UI tweaks become one user-facing bullet, and three internal refactors disappear because users don’t care.
Here’s what the published weekly changelog looks like after grouping and rewrites:
The rewrites are where most teams win back time. A PR note like “Refactor billing-summary component, rename prop, update tests” becomes “Improved the Billing page layout and labels for clearer totals.” Another like “Fix N+1 query in projects list” becomes “Improved dashboard load time when you have many projects.”
Screenshots prevent confusion when wording changes. If a button label changes from “Archive” to “Deactivate,” the image makes it obvious what users will see, and support doesn’t need to guess which screen the note refers to.
The biggest difference between “we tried this once” and release notes that stick is a small routine. Pick one person to own the notes for each release window, and give them a fixed 30-minute slot on the calendar. When it has an owner and a time box, it stops being everyone’s problem.
Make your PR template and screenshot rules part of normal work, not a special process. If a PR is missing the user-facing sentence or the before/after snapshot, it’s not “extra polish.” It’s missing information.
A lightweight draft doc is an easy habit-builder. Keep one running draft for the current release and update it as PRs merge, while context is fresh. Release day becomes editing, not writing from scratch.
A simple rhythm that works well:
If formatting still takes too long, build a small internal draft generator. It can read PR text, apply your template headings, and output a clean draft that only needs light editing. Start small: grouping by heading and pulling in screenshot captions is often enough.
If you want to prototype that kind of generator via chat, Koder.ai (koder.ai) is one option. You can iterate quickly on the prompt and output format, then export the source code when you’re ready to maintain it internally.
Use PR titles and PR descriptions as the primary source, because they usually include the “why” and the user impact. Commits are great for tracing code changes, but they rarely read like something a customer would understand.
Write the title in plain language about the outcome a user will notice. If it can be copied into a changelog with minimal edits, it’s doing its job.
Keep it short and consistent: what changed, who it affects, and where to find it. This avoids vague notes and makes each entry easy to scan later.
Pick 4 to 6 stable categories users recognize, such as New, Improvements, Fixes, Security, and Admin. Keeping the same buckets every time reduces formatting drift and speeds up sorting.
If a user could notice it, rely on it, or search for it, include it. Pure refactors, dependency bumps, and logging changes should stay in an internal changelog unless they change behavior.
Add screenshots only when the UI changed and the image will reduce confusion, like a moved button, a renamed label, or a new step in a flow. One clear screenshot (or a before/after pair) is usually enough.
Use a consistent, searchable naming pattern that includes the date and the area of the product. Add the PR identifier in the filename or caption so you can trace the change quickly when questions come up.
Say the impact first and tell users what to do next. Skip the technical cause and be explicit about where to make the change so users aren’t left guessing.
Only include known issues that users are likely to hit soon, and keep the wording direct. If you have a workaround, state it plainly so support and users can act immediately.
Treat every merged PR as a small user-facing story, then compile merged PR notes for a set window and group them into your fixed categories. Tools can help draft and format, but you still want a quick human pass to remove duplicates and ensure the wording matches what users see.